What happened to gorilla in the room?
Please make comments.
Please make comments.
posted by Brian at 11:31 AM
Monday, May 09, 2005
Previous Posts
- AIPAC Investigation Hinders Push for War with Iran?
- Pollard and AIPAC
- "The Coming Pax Americana"
- Rosen and Weissman Refuse to Take the Fall for AIPAC
- MEK Event in Washington, DC
- Iran Freedom Foundation -- More Info
- Tip Request -- Who is Funding the Iran Freedom Fou...
- Ariel Sharon's Visit to Crawford
- Terrorist Group to Hold Convention in Washington, ...
- Israel Honors Members of Terror Cell Which Bombed ...
20 Comments:
Cleary, the mossad got to him.
;-)
I want to know what happened to gorillaintheroom.blogspot.com as well? Has it been censored because of the informative material it had about the AIPAC (pro-Israel) lobby and its espionage via the Zionist (JINSA/CSP/PNAC) Pentagon Neocons who took us to war in Iraq for Israel and now have their sights set on Iran and Syria (for Israel as well) as the following URLs convey:
http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=20366
Zionist (JINSA/CSP/PNAC) Neocons and their US media cronies after Iran
for Israel
http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=23715&page=4&pp=10
http://nomorewarforisrael.blogspot.com
If the Zionists get to the above blog as well (like what has apparently happened to 'gorillaintheroom.blogspot.com), please keep an eye on www.whatreallyhappened.com and the following URL as well:
Wake Up America! Your Government has been Hijacked by Zionism:
http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewforum.php?f=24
Gonzales.
Even if GIR was attacked/arrested/etc., it is evidence of great success rather than failure. The zionists have influence mainly through propaganda. They are not capable of "direct dictatorship."
This is a sign of the beginning of their end.
Thanks, truthseeker, did you just join blogspot to help? Thanks also to whoever restored some access here? Now we know there is a problem.
GIR posts still exist at:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/5/4/203725/1855
If you are subscribed there, let them know.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Hi Joe,
Thank you for that excellent URL reference as I just saw there that the Armed Services Committee hearing with Richard Perle (when he lied to Congressman Walter Jones about his involvement with the 'A Clean Break'/war for Israel agenda as Jones used James Bamford's 'A Pretext for War' book as a guide from what I had heard) is still linked there..
I had visited gorillaintheroom.blogspot.com often and was very concerned/irked to see that it had gone offline when I checked in late last night. I was very glad to see that Brian had courageously stepped in to restart it. Especially when gorillaintheroom.blogspot.com had made it onto many of the Internet Newsgroups via http://www.groups.google.com and similar. The truth needs to get out to as many Americans as possible before the Likudnik Neocons take us to war with Iran and Syria (for Israel as well) in the very near future (June or shortly thereafter according to the 'Sleepwalking to Disaster in Iran' article by Scott Ritter which one can scroll down to at the following URL:
JINSA Israel firsters: IRAQ DOWN, IRAN STILL TO GO:
http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=32610
Look how the 'Media' (with Arianna Huffington) panel wouldn't answer the Likudnik Neocon question posed to it as the panel there with Maureen Dowd did the same (can watch both panels via computer using the links at the following URL):
http://www.booktv.org/misc/la_festival_043005.asp#saturday
At least Los Angeles Times (War on Terror) reporter Terry McDermott affirmed (via the panel discussion that he was on which can also be watched via the link at the above URL)that the USA was attacked on 9/11 because of US support (see the link at www.wrmea.com for how many BILLIONS of US taxpayer dollars are flowed to Israel as US states go broke) of Israel's brutal repression of the Palestinian people:
LA Times (Terry McDermott): US support of Israel motivation for 9/11 attack:
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=29514
New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman also skirted the question about the Likudnik Neocons (it was the first viewer call posed to him as one can see via the link at the following URL):
http://www.booktv.org/feature/index.asp?segid=5669&schedID=343
Ex-Mossad chief: U.S. may stay in Iraq for years to come
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=34344
Some Israel-firster figured out his real identity and threatened him, or perhaps someone in the government forced him to take it down? (He got a little too close to the truth)?
Come on people, GIR was not deeply committed to this blog and seldom post anything. I think the effort to maintain a blog on such a delicate subject put a stress on him. Since the beginning he was very affraid of what he was doing and did not want to be regarded as antisemite. But we all know the lady Gorilla is ugly as hell. GIR didn't want to say it out loud. He wanted to be polite, he wanted to be a nice democratic party blogger. A kind of Gorillatrios or Talking Gorillapointer. All fame, no blame. He jumped out. No Mossad assassins, no overwhelming pressure, no Gonzales. GIR went as far as any insider can go if it want's to remain inside. He didn't want to be left out of the ball. Lady Gorilla smells funny, but is a fine dancer.
This blog was slow, but the commentators were very good. I would like to thank you all. Particularly the reader who posted the Timeline. Thank you guys.
They can win this battle, but they're going to lose the war!
I am very surprised by the turn of events. I thought the Gorilla was very committed and knowledgeable.
I hate to say it, but a lot of people who are willing to talk about this subject are easily dismissed because they make stupid statements or use inappropriate language. That's just the way life is.
Gorilla knew what he was doing and was very effective. If he was just not committed I don't see why he didn't say - sorry I don't have time, but I will leave what I have.
To delete the whole website without one word? That is very strange.
gorilla was wise, gorilla was reasonable (kind, in fact, to his opponents), gorilla was democratic with a small 'd' --- as were many of the opponents of the bolsheviks, last century's version of the neo-cons...
[Anonymous said...
Come on people, GIR was not deeply committed to this blog and seldom post anything. ]
I'm sorry but that is not the way I see it. He was doing a great job, and in fact this blog was really starting to catch on. That my friend, may be why it was yanked, if you know what I mean.
Dear Brian, GIR was indeed knowledgeable but I wouldn't call him very committed. I think you were expecting too much from him. He clearly had other priorities and I do think he just decided to get himself focused on his daily job. But I maintain the readers and commentators were the strength of this blog. Keep them if you can. Some of them know a lot, even the ones who don't write english very well. Lady Gorilla always has a big hairy hug for her people. Why don't we do the same for ours?
To Mr. Somebody: I do agree he was doing a great (albeit slow) job and I would be very pleased If he would just continue it. But I don't think he was such a threat to be yanked out of cyberspace or even life. I will wait and hope it's all a publicity stunt like he did when he started this blog.
Well I have no idea why Gorilla quit, if indeed he has ...maybe Gorilla is part of former congressman Paul Finnley's Council on National Interest that is working to get AIPAC required to register as a foreign agency and had second thoughts about a public blog...or maybe he was just a concerned and enlightened citizen who found he didn't have time to keep this blog up..doesn't really matter...everything that was posted on here is true and in the public sphere anyway....and there is no reason for us not to continue to share information.
I doubt the threat of reprisal from any pro-Israeli lobbying source had anything to do with his departure unless his job was an issue. Too many people are becoming educated on the threat of the Israeli and the neocon influence on our government for them to be able shut down the discussion now, and the more they try to, the more people will keep talking.
If they do end up creating more wars in Arab countries and a Russian/European/US standoff in the mid east, at least we will have the dots connected.
Maybe a clue (from Antiwar Blog):
"As a result, Newsweek has learned, journalists and bloggers may face questioning by FBI agents in the case. Though reporters are not "targets" of the investigation, they could get subpoenas if they refuse to cooperate."
I have a blog in another language in this same system, severely criticising the lapdog government of my country, the present USA, Blair UK and Sharon Israel, since october last year.
My articles are mailed mainly to politicians and media, until now nothing happened; this includes comments, which are VERY few.
However, a tv station recently polled about terrorism and so on, and the question was put in if the people saw the government of USA lapdogs.
The response was that some 65% indeed saw the government as USA lapdogs.
I flatter myself with the illusion that my frequent use of the expression lapdog made the pollers use the word.
So I simply continue wth telling thr truth, as I see it.
Just heard on the news that Iran will be taken up at the UN Security Council (for Israel, of course) if it goes ahead with its nuclear enrichment program... Looks like Scott Ritter's 'Sleepwalking to Disaster' article is right on track for a June attack on Iran (or shortly thereafter):
Scott Ritter: Sleepwalking to Disaster in Iran:
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=32220
http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=23715&page=4&pp=10
JINSA Israel firsters: IRAQ DOWN, IRAN LEFT TO GO:
http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=32610
Gorilla angered the Mossad by shedding light on and promoting the Franklin indictment. Maybe they just took revenge on him.
Worst case, he is a martyr and a hero of the Second American Revolution.
In this case, who killed his blog? And what roll did blogspot play? How come they just accepted Brian to replace him?
I do not have a good feeling about some of Brian's comments. I might be wrong (sorry).
I fully admit I can't fill GIR's shoes.
The first GIR blog was "deleted", which can typically only be done by the owner. I have deleted my own blogs in the past.
Once the blog is deleted the name becomes available, and I just created a new blog with the old name. I didn't want someone with an opposing viewpoint to take the name.
If you have any suggestions for improving GIR II please let me know.
I am even open to letting others post, but I want to keep the tone of the original GIR. No ranting.
Post a Comment
<< Home